Web3 & Blockchain Development
Web3 development means building applications whose logic and ownership records live on a blockchain rather than only on a company's servers.
From smart contracts to full product launches, we build on-chain products that ship. Our team has delivered DeFi infrastructure, token launchpads, and Web3 platforms across EVM chains, Solana, and L2s, with security and wallet UX treated as first-class concerns rather than afterthoughts.
Who this is for
- Protocol teams that need contracts written and hardened before an external audit
- Teams with working contracts and no frontend that ordinary users can operate
- Projects planning a token launch who need the vesting, distribution, and compliance work handled
- Companies moving an existing product on-chain and choosing a network for the first time
When it's not a fit
- A blockchain is not required. If no part of the product needs shared state between parties who do not trust each other, a database is the better answer and we will say so.
- You need a formal audit. We do pre-audit hardening; the audit itself should come from an independent firm.
- The token is the product and there is nothing else. We build software, not token launches on their own.
- The timeline is set by a marketing date rather than by the work. Rushed contract deployments are expensive in a way web releases are not.
What We Deliver
Smart Contract Engineering
Solidity, Vyper, and Rust contracts written with security in mind — upgrade paths, gas optimisation, and pre-audit hardening.
dApp & Frontend Development
Production dApp frontends with wallet flows, signing UX, indexed data, and clean integration with your contracts.
DeFi Protocols
Vaults, AMMs, lending, staking, and yield products — engineered, tested, and integrated with existing DeFi infrastructure.
Token Launches & Launchpads
Token standards (ERC-20/721/1155, SPL), vesting, distribution, and launchpad platforms with KYC and AML hooks.
NFT & Tokenized Platforms
Mint engines, marketplaces, and tokenized communities for art, gaming, real-world assets, and creator economies.
Web3 Architecture Reviews
Protocol design reviews, chain selection, and infrastructure setup across RPC providers, indexers, and subgraphs.
Common Use Cases
- DeFi protocol design and engineering — lending, AMMs, vaults
- Token launchpads with vesting, KYC, and distribution
- NFT mint platforms and on-chain marketplaces
- Cross-chain bridges and L2 deployments
- Wallet flows, gasless meta-transactions, and account abstraction
- On-chain identity, reputation, and SBT systems
- Creator and community platforms backed by tokens
Tech Stack
Outcomes you can expect
- Contracts ready to hand to an auditor, with the test coverage to back them
- A dApp that behaves like an ordinary web app for people who do not own a hardware wallet
- Reusable on-chain infrastructure you can extend to the next product
- A documented, defensible reason for the network you launched on
What you receive
Everything below is handed over to you. Code and infrastructure live in your accounts, not ours.
- Contracts in your repository with a test suite and fuzz coverage
- Deployment scripts and verified contract addresses per network
- A dApp frontend with wallet connection and signing flows
- Indexing setup — subgraph or equivalent — for reading chain state
- A pre-audit report listing what was hardened and what an auditor should focus on
- Runbooks for upgrades, pausing, and key management
Engagement models
Fixed-scope project
A defined deliverable at a fixed price, scoped up front. Best when you know what you need built and want a firm schedule and budget.
Best when: You know what you need built and want a firm budget and date.
Retainer
Ongoing delivery, maintenance, or advisory billed monthly. Best for continuous improvement after launch, or when priorities shift faster than a fixed scope allows.
Best when: The work is continuous and priorities shift faster than a fixed scope allows.
Extended team
Our engineers working inside your team, your process, and your repositories. Best when you have the roadmap but not the capacity or the specific skills.
Best when: You have the roadmap but not the capacity or a specific skill.
Frequently asked questions about Web3 & Blockchain Development
EVM chains including Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism, plus Solana using Rust and Anchor. Chain selection is part of the engagement: we weigh transaction cost, finality, tooling maturity, and where your users and liquidity already are, rather than defaulting to one network.
We do pre-audit hardening, not formal audits. That means writing contracts with security in mind, gas optimisation, test and fuzz coverage, and design reviews so the code is audit-ready. Commission the audit itself from an independent firm; we prepare the code and fix what they find.
Choosing a standard such as ERC-20 or SPL, then writing and testing the contract, then the operational work: vesting schedules, distribution, and KYC or AML hooks where they are required. If you also need a launchpad, that is a full platform build on top of the token.
Yes. We review the existing contracts and their upgrade paths before changing anything, then extend or integrate against them. Where contracts are immutable we build around them at the indexer and frontend layer. A design review is usually the first deliverable in that situation.
Yes. We build dApp frontends with wallet connection, signing flows, and indexed data so the app feels as quick as an ordinary web app. We use Viem, wagmi, and RainbowKit, with The Graph, Alchemy, or Infura for reading chain state.
Yes. We build meta-transaction and account abstraction flows so users can transact without holding gas or managing a seed phrase. For a consumer dApp this is usually the single largest improvement to onboarding, and it is worth deciding on before the contracts are finalised.
Discovery. We agree the goal, review whatever exists already, and produce a written scope: what will be built, in what order, what you will receive, and what we need from you. It ends with a plan you can approve, amend, or take elsewhere.
The outcome you want and how you will judge it, access to any existing code, designs, hosting, and analytics, one person who can make decisions, and any hard constraints — a fixed launch date, a required stack, compliance obligations. Missing pieces we can work around; an unnamed decision-maker we cannot.
Both. Our published work spans early-stage products and established companies, and our smallest engagements are single fixed-scope projects. What matters is that someone on your side can make decisions and that the problem is defined well enough to scope, not company size.
Yes, as a retainer covering monitoring, security patching, dependency upgrades, performance work, and a monthly allowance for fixes and small changes. You get a report each month showing what was done. It is a separate engagement from the build, so upkeep does not compete with feature work.
Engineering and design work is delivered remotely, so location is not a constraint for those. Our in-person work — hackathons, builder houses, developer meetups, and campus programmes — runs in Delhi, Bangalore, Hyderabad, and Mumbai, plus university campuses across the country.
You get a written summary of what we understood, a proposed scope broken into phases, what each phase delivers, and the engagement model we would recommend. If we think you should buy something off the shelf or not build yet, the summary says that instead.